++
A novice in a busy electrophysiology (EP) laboratory will generally learn to recognize common arrhythmias in a relatively short time. It requires considerably more seasoning to recognize the variants and unusual mechanisms, or to “hit the curve ball.” It is hoped that the following commentary helps provide structure and focus to the EP study and facilitates analysis of the case studies to follow.
+++
IT BEGINS WITH THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM
++
The EP study is an extension of the electrocardiogram (ECG) with the addition of intracardiac recording and programmed electrical stimulation. Insightful interpretation of the ECG allows for prospective consideration of additional catheters, stimulation sequences, or maneuvers appropriate for the postulated arrhythmia. This interpretation limits the diagnostic possibilities and avoids unnecessary steps (Case 1–1). The fundamentals of ECG interpretation of an arrhythmia include the identification of P waves, determining the atrioventricular (AV) relationship, and analyzing the QRS morphology (Table 1–1). For confusing problems, it helps to create a “written” list of all potential hypotheses and to plan for specific interventions that will test them. As data are accumulated during the EP study, the facts supporting or refuting the hypotheses can be tabulated. The hypotheses can be represented by schematic drawings for complicated scenarios. This method is illustrated at the end of this chapter.
++++
+++
LESS IS OFTEN NOT MORE
++
There are those gifted, intuitive individuals who leap to the correct diagnosis and apparently bypass all the rational, systematic steps. Most of us, however, are better served by a consistent, methodical approach that does not cut corners. A sample protocol for an ...